U.S. ex rel. Luke v. Healthsouth Corporation, 2:13-cv-01319-APG-VCF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180329f00
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendants HealthSouth Corporation and HealthSouth of Henderson, Inc. (collectively the "HealthSouth Defendants") and Plaintiff-Relator Joshua Luke hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the Court's approval, as follows: 1. By Order dated March 13, 2018 (Dkt. #129), the Court scheduled Oral argument on the HealthSouth Defendants' pending Motion for Protective Order (Dkt
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendants HealthSouth Corporation and HealthSouth of Henderson, Inc. (collectively the "HealthSouth Defendants") and Plaintiff-Relator Joshua Luke hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the Court's approval, as follows: 1. By Order dated March 13, 2018 (Dkt. #129), the Court scheduled Oral argument on the HealthSouth Defendants' pending Motion for Protective Order (Dkt...
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants HealthSouth Corporation and HealthSouth of Henderson, Inc. (collectively the "HealthSouth Defendants") and Plaintiff-Relator Joshua Luke hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the Court's approval, as follows:
1. By Order dated March 13, 2018 (Dkt. #129), the Court scheduled Oral argument on the HealthSouth Defendants' pending Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. #104) for May 18, 2018.
2. Jeff Layne, counsel for Defendants has a preexisting commitment that conflicts with this date.
3. Counsel conferred concerning their respective schedules. Counsel for both sides would be available for oral argument, the following week on May 24 or 25, 2018. Accordingly, they respectfully request that the Court reschedule oral argument—if possible—to one of those days, or sometime soon thereafter. Additionally, the parties would prefer an afternoon setting if at all possible based on the number of attorneys traveling from out of town.
This stipulation is made in good faith, is not interposed for delay, and is not filed for an improper purpose. This is the first stipulation to reschedule this oral argument.
ORDER
The Motion is GRANTED. The oral argument on Defendants' Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. #104) is hereby rescheduled to May 24, 2018. at 1:00 PM, Courtroom 3D.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
