First 100, LLC v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, 2:15-cv-01303-APG-PAL. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180403c66
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . On March 7, 2018, Magistrate Judge Leen issued a report and recommendation in which she recommends that I dismiss plaintiff First 100, LLC's complaint because First 100 has failed to comply with court orders that it obtain counsel and has not kept the court apprised of a current address. First 100 did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo revi
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . On March 7, 2018, Magistrate Judge Leen issued a report and recommendation in which she recommends that I dismiss plaintiff First 100, LLC's complaint because First 100 has failed to comply with court orders that it obtain counsel and has not kept the court apprised of a current address. First 100 did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo revie..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
On March 7, 2018, Magistrate Judge Leen issued a report and recommendation in which she recommends that I dismiss plaintiff First 100, LLC's complaint because First 100 has failed to comply with court orders that it obtain counsel and has not kept the court apprised of a current address. First 100 did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leen's report and recommendation (ECF No. 54) is accepted. Plaintiff First 100, LLC's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The defendants' counterclaims remain pending subject to the stay previously entered. See ECF No. 42.
Source: Leagle
