STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THAT MOTION TO DISMISS (SECOND REQUEST)

JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.

COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, LEE KIRK ("Kirk"), by and through his attorney, JENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ., of the law firm HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP, and Defendants, TRULITE GLASS AND ALUMINUM SOLUTIONS, LLC, HERBERT CORTEZ, STEVE WILLIAMS, and SHAUN HANNA, ("DEFENDANTS"), by and through their attorney, TIMOTHY ROEHRS, ESQ., of LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. and hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. That the Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss that was due on March 28th, 2018, will now be due on April 11th, 2018.

2. That the Reply to the Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss will then be due on April 25th, 2018.

3. This request for an extension of time is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay and is being made because the parties are presently working on a stipulation that they believe will result in the withdrawal of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and the filing of an Amended Complaint.

4. This is the second request for an extension of time with respect to the Opposition and Reply briefs associated with Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the foregoing STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THAT MOTION TO DISMISS in the above-entitled matter and for good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS SO ORDERED that the Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be due on April 11th, 2018;

IT IS SO ORDERED that the Reply to the Opposition to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be due on April 25th, 2018.