JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Credit Suisse, by and through its undersigned counsel, Elizabeth W. Walker of the law firm Sidley Austin LLP and William M. Noall of the law firm Garman Turner Gordon LLP, Larry Lattig, as Creditor Trustee (the "
a. On December 12, 2017, this Court issued a Minute Order [ECF No. 27] (the "
b. On December 29, 2017, this Court issued an Order [ECF No. 31] extending the deadlines contained in the Minute Order to March 2, 2018, April 6, 2018, and April 20, 2018, respectively, to facilitate the Parties' planned mediation with the Honorable Gregg W. Zive.
c. On January 23, 2018 the Parties mediated the disputes involved in what is referred to by the Parties and the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada as the "Indemnification Dispute," which include this appeal.
d. On March 2, 2018, the Parties submitted their Second Stipulation and Order to Extend Briefing Schedule to Facilitate Mediation [ECF No. 32] ("
e. On March 30, 2018, this Court issued an order [ECF No. 33] granting the Extension Stipulation thereby extending the deadlines to April 6, 2018, May 4, 2018 and May 18, 2018.
f. Since the Parties entered into the Extension Stipulation, they have continued negotiating the documentation to implement the agreements made at mediation, including documentation that will allow the termination of this appeal. However, primarily due to the fact that several of the attorneys representing Parties were engaged in unrelated trials during the Extension Period that ran much longer than they originally expected, and the additional fact that it took more time than anticipated to obtain the additional 46 interested parties' updated contact information, the Parties have not yet obtained the necessary order from Judge Nakagawa that will in turn facilitate the dismissal of this appeal by the April 6, 2018 briefing deadline. Though the Parties believe they should have the papers to dismiss this appeal filed within about thirty (30) days, out of an abundance of caution, they hereby seek a sixty (60) day extension of the briefing deadlines to avoid the need for further extensions of time from this Court.
g. The Parties do not wish to expend further resources on this appeal pending its dismissal.
h. In view of the foregoing and consistent with Bankruptcy Rule 8009, made applicable to this appeal pursuant to LR 8018, the Parties have further met and conferred regarding an extension of the current briefing schedule.
Based upon the above Recitals and subject to the entry of an order by this Court approving this Stipulation, the Parties agree that: