Filed: Apr. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Second Request) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Defendants RAINMAKER SECURITIES, LLC and PARK LANE IBS LLC (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their attorneys of record, James L. Kopecky, Esq. of KOPECKY SCHUMACHER ROSENBURG PC and Chad C. Butterfield, Esq. of WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, and Plaintiff FREDERICK M. DOUMANI, SR., as assignee of EMIL INTERACTIVE GAMES
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Second Request) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Defendants RAINMAKER SECURITIES, LLC and PARK LANE IBS LLC (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their attorneys of record, James L. Kopecky, Esq. of KOPECKY SCHUMACHER ROSENBURG PC and Chad C. Butterfield, Esq. of WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, and Plaintiff FREDERICK M. DOUMANI, SR., as assignee of EMIL INTERACTIVE GAMES,..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
(Second Request)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants RAINMAKER SECURITIES, LLC and PARK LANE IBS LLC (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their attorneys of record, James L. Kopecky, Esq. of KOPECKY SCHUMACHER ROSENBURG PC and Chad C. Butterfield, Esq. of WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, and Plaintiff FREDERICK M. DOUMANI, SR., as assignee of EMIL INTERACTIVE GAMES, LLC, hereby stipulate and agree that the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's complaint by 60 days, from the current deadline of April 11, 2018 to June 11, 2018.
This stipulation is submitted in compliance with LR IA 6-1. Good cause exists for the requested extension, as the parties are attempting to implement the prior settlement agreement previously referenced by Defendants. See ECF No. 14. Accordingly, the parties agree that the requested extension furthers the interests of this litigation and is not being requested in bad faith or to delay these proceedings unnecessarily. This is Defendants' second request for extension of the deadline.
So Stipulated:
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.
