Filed: Apr. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2018
Summary: Order [Docket Nos. 74, 77] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court are two motions to seal exhibits filed with respect to a discovery dispute. Docket Nos. 74, 77; see also Docket Nos. 58, 68 (sealed documents). A response was not filed to either motion. Proposed redactions were filed with the motions. Docket Nos. 74-1, 74-2, 74-3, 74-5, 77-1, 77-2, 77-3. The Court may seal information filed in relation to a non-dispositive motion upon a particularized showing of good
Summary: Order [Docket Nos. 74, 77] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court are two motions to seal exhibits filed with respect to a discovery dispute. Docket Nos. 74, 77; see also Docket Nos. 58, 68 (sealed documents). A response was not filed to either motion. Proposed redactions were filed with the motions. Docket Nos. 74-1, 74-2, 74-3, 74-5, 77-1, 77-2, 77-3. The Court may seal information filed in relation to a non-dispositive motion upon a particularized showing of good ..
More
Order
[Docket Nos. 74, 77]
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court are two motions to seal exhibits filed with respect to a discovery dispute. Docket Nos. 74, 77; see also Docket Nos. 58, 68 (sealed documents). A response was not filed to either motion. Proposed redactions were filed with the motions. Docket Nos. 74-1, 74-2, 74-3, 74-5, 77-1, 77-2, 77-3. The Court may seal information filed in relation to a non-dispositive motion upon a particularized showing of good cause. See, e.g., Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006). In this case, the parties seek to keep secret redacted information related to medical issues, sexual history, and settlement discussions. Good cause exists to do so, and the motions are therefore GRANTED. The Clerk's Office is INSTRUCTED to continue maintaining under seal the exhibits at Docket Nos. 58 and 68.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
