Filed: Apr. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING JAMES BRAINARD FROM ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between, Plaintiff, Holly Riggs, an individual; Elise Riggs, a minor by her guardian; and Jakob Riggs, a minor by his guardian ("Plaintiff"), by and through their counsel of record, the Gibson Law Group; and Defendant, Deputy James Brainard, by and through his counsel of record, the law firm of Marquis Aurbach Coffing: 1. The claims asserted agains
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING JAMES BRAINARD FROM ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between, Plaintiff, Holly Riggs, an individual; Elise Riggs, a minor by her guardian; and Jakob Riggs, a minor by his guardian ("Plaintiff"), by and through their counsel of record, the Gibson Law Group; and Defendant, Deputy James Brainard, by and through his counsel of record, the law firm of Marquis Aurbach Coffing: 1. The claims asserted against..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING JAMES BRAINARD FROM ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between, Plaintiff, Holly Riggs, an individual; Elise Riggs, a minor by her guardian; and Jakob Riggs, a minor by his guardian ("Plaintiff"), by and through their counsel of record, the Gibson Law Group; and Defendant, Deputy James Brainard, by and through his counsel of record, the law firm of Marquis Aurbach Coffing:
1. The claims asserted against James Brainard in above-reference action are dismissed with prejudice; and
2. Each party shall bear his/its own costs and attorney's fees incurred in this action;
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
