Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Porteous v. Capital One Services II, LLC, 2:17-cv-02866-JCM-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180419d43 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR (i) DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CIRCULATION OF NOTICE PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. 216(b) AND (ii) PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER REPLY TO THE OPPOSITION (Second Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiff Natasha Porteous ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Capital One Services II, LLC ("Defendant") hereby stipulate to an extension of time: (i) up to and including May 4, 2018 for Defendant to file its Opposition to Plaintiff'
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR (i) DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CIRCULATION OF NOTICE PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) AND (ii) PLAINTIFF TO FILE HER REPLY TO THE OPPOSITION

(Second Request)

Plaintiff Natasha Porteous ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Capital One Services II, LLC ("Defendant") hereby stipulate to an extension of time: (i) up to and including May 4, 2018 for Defendant to file its Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Circulation of Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), and (ii) up to and including May 18, 2018 for Plaintiff to file her Reply to Defendant's Opposition.

This is the second request for an extension of time to file an Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Circulation of Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and a Reply to the Opposition. The parties' first request, which was granted by this Court, granted the following deadlines: (i) up to and including April 20, 2018 for Defendant to file its Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Circulation of Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), and (ii) up to two weeks from the filing of Defendant's Opposition for Plaintiff to file her Reply to Defendant's Opposition.

This second request is made due to Defendant's counsels' vacation and travel schedules. Counsel requires adequate time to consult with Defendant's various representatives in order to thoroughly investigate the allegations contained within Plaintiff's motion in order to prepare an Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion.

This request is sought in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer