Lee v. U.S., 2:14-cv-00606-RCJ-PAL. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180424831
Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [and Proposed Order] ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Come now the parties, the United States of America and Theodore Lee, who hereby stipulate that the Complaint and Counterclaim in this case should be dismissed with prejudice, and each party to bear its owns attorneys' fees and costs. The parties have agreed that neither party may use any part of their settlement regarding Theodore Lee's 2006 federal income tax year in any other proceeding or ne
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [and Proposed Order] ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Come now the parties, the United States of America and Theodore Lee, who hereby stipulate that the Complaint and Counterclaim in this case should be dismissed with prejudice, and each party to bear its owns attorneys' fees and costs. The parties have agreed that neither party may use any part of their settlement regarding Theodore Lee's 2006 federal income tax year in any other proceeding or neg..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [and Proposed Order]
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Come now the parties, the United States of America and Theodore Lee, who hereby stipulate that the Complaint and Counterclaim in this case should be dismissed with prejudice, and each party to bear its owns attorneys' fees and costs.
The parties have agreed that neither party may use any part of their settlement regarding Theodore Lee's 2006 federal income tax year in any other proceeding or negotiation, whether it be administrative or judicial, for any purpose regarding any other tax liability for any other tax year of Theodore Lee.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
