Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Giavanna Homeowners Association, 2:15-cv-01992-LDG-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180427968 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER CERTIFYING MARCH 27, 2018 ORDER [ECF NO. 134] AS FINAL, DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND STAYING REMAINING CLAIMS PENDING APPEAL LLOYD D. GEORGE , District Judge . Based on the stipulation filed by plaintiff and counter-defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC, defendant and third party plaintiff Giavanna Homeowners Association, and defendant, counterclaimant and cross-claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, cross-defendant Bank of America, N.A. ( BANA ), pursuant to Rule 54(b), the court
More

ORDER CERTIFYING MARCH 27, 2018 ORDER [ECF NO. 134] AS FINAL, DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND STAYING REMAINING CLAIMS PENDING APPEAL

Based on the stipulation filed by plaintiff and counter-defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC, defendant and third party plaintiff Giavanna Homeowners Association, and defendant, counterclaimant and cross-claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, cross-defendant Bank of America, N.A. (BANA), pursuant to Rule 54(b), the court certifies its order granting Nationstar and BANA's motion for partial summary judgment entered on March 27, 2018 (the order), ECF No. 134, as final, and determines there is no just reason for the delay in the entry of final judgment (1) in Nationstar's favor and against all defendants on Nationstar's first cause of action for declaratory judgment/quiet title, (2) in Nationstar and BANA's favor on SFR's first cause of action for quiet title, (3) in Nationstar and BANA's favor on SFR's second cause of action for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, and (4) in Nationstar and BANA's favor on SFR's third cause of action for slander of title. The clerk is directed to enter final judgment in accordance herewith.

The court further finds, to avoid unnecessary costs and expenses, all remaining claims shall be stayed pending appeal. If no party timely appeals the order, ECF No. 134, the stay shall automatically lift. If any party timely appeals, the remaining claims shall remain stayed until the Ninth Circuit issues its mandate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer