Gray v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02307-JAD-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180501624
Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REVERSAL OR REMAND (THIRD REQUEST) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from April 26, 2018 to April 30, 2018 . This is Defendant's third request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extensi
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REVERSAL OR REMAND (THIRD REQUEST) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from April 26, 2018 to April 30, 2018 . This is Defendant's third request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extensio..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REVERSAL OR REMAND
(THIRD REQUEST)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from April 26, 2018 to April 30, 2018. This is Defendant's third request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel was out on leave last week. As a result, Counsel fell behind on her heavy caseload. Counsel has over 75+ pending social security cases, which require two or more dispositive motions a week until late June. Counsel also has to attend an all-day mandatory training on the date of the current filing deadline. Due to current workload demands and unanticipated leave, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Counsel apologizes for the belated request, but did not anticipate seeking additional time due to her unanticipated leave. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
