Stoner v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2:17-cv-01403-JAD-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180502j81
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 01, 2018
Latest Update: May 01, 2018
Summary: Order Re: Letter Submission JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . On April 30, 2018, the court received a letter from plaintiff Kurt Stoner advising that he is having poor luck finding a new attorney since his last one withdrew, and stating that he "would like to continue trying to find counsel to represent" him. ECF No. 30. The court hereby cautions Mr. Stoner that the court does not act in response to letters. A party who wants the court to take (or delay) action must file a written motio
Summary: Order Re: Letter Submission JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . On April 30, 2018, the court received a letter from plaintiff Kurt Stoner advising that he is having poor luck finding a new attorney since his last one withdrew, and stating that he "would like to continue trying to find counsel to represent" him. ECF No. 30. The court hereby cautions Mr. Stoner that the court does not act in response to letters. A party who wants the court to take (or delay) action must file a written motion..
More
Order Re: Letter Submission
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
On April 30, 2018, the court received a letter from plaintiff Kurt Stoner advising that he is having poor luck finding a new attorney since his last one withdrew, and stating that he "would like to continue trying to find counsel to represent" him. ECF No. 30. The court hereby cautions Mr. Stoner that the court does not act in response to letters. A party who wants the court to take (or delay) action must file a written motion supported by a memorandum of points and authorities and serve it on all other parties who have appeared. See Local Rule 7-2. The court notes that the defendant in this case has filed a motion to dismiss. See ECF No. 25. Stoner's opposition to that motion, if any, was due on April 26, 2018. Stoner is cautioned that his letter will not be construed as an opposition to that motion, and the court may construe Stoner's failure to timely oppose that motion as his consent to granting the motion to dismiss. See Local Rule 7-2(d).
Source: Leagle
