Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Humphreys v. Ally Bank, 2:18-cv-00725-JAD-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180514554 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 09, 2018
Latest Update: May 09, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT ALLY BANK dba GMAC'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Laurie A. Humphreys ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Ally Bank dba GMAC ("Ally Bank") hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Ally Bank to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) shall be extended thirty (30) days, up to and including June 11, 2018. Based upon the April 23, 20
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT ALLY BANK dba GMAC'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(A), Local Rules IA 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Laurie A. Humphreys ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Ally Bank dba GMAC ("Ally Bank") hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Ally Bank to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) shall be extended thirty (30) days, up to and including June 11, 2018. Based upon the April 23, 2018 service date, Ally Bank's response is currently due May 11, 2018. Ally Bank requested this extension to which Plaintiff courteously agreed to provide Ally Bank with time to investigate Plaintiff's claims and to secure local counsel, and so that Plaintiff and Ally Bank (the "Parties") may explore resolution of this matter.

This is the Parties' first request for an extension of Ally Bank's time to respond to the Complaint, and will not affect any deadlines in this case. This stipulation is made without prejudice to the rights, claims, arguments and defense of all Parties.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer