Filed: May 16, 2018
Latest Update: May 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S DISABILITY CLAIM (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . COMES NOW, Defendant XL, INC. d/b/a/GREAT CLIPS (hereinafter "Defendant"), by and through its counsel, HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC, and Plaintiff, ROSALYN LOPEZ (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), by and through her counsel, the law firm of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time fo
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S DISABILITY CLAIM (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . COMES NOW, Defendant XL, INC. d/b/a/GREAT CLIPS (hereinafter "Defendant"), by and through its counsel, HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC, and Plaintiff, ROSALYN LOPEZ (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), by and through her counsel, the law firm of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S DISABILITY CLAIM
(First Request)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
COMES NOW, Defendant XL, INC. d/b/a/GREAT CLIPS (hereinafter "Defendant"), by and through its counsel, HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC, and Plaintiff, ROSALYN LOPEZ (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), by and through her counsel, the law firm of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Defendant to provide a reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Disability Claim [ECF #34], due on May 18, 2018, to June 1, 2018. This request is submitted pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2 and LR II 7-1 and 26-4, and is the parties' first request for an extension of time for Defendant to provide a reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Disability Claim.
Defendant's counsel requests the extension due to being out of town in the days leading up to the original deadline. Defendant also seeks additional time in order to contact out-of-state witnesses necessary to Defendant's reply.
Accordingly, Defendant shall be extended until June 1, 2018 to provide a reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Disability Claim [ECF #34].
IT IS SO ORDERED.