Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Williamson v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, 2:17-cv-02653-RFB-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180518d60 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 17, 2018
Latest Update: May 17, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, by and through their undersigned counsel of record that, pursuant to LR 26-4, the Scheduling Order (Doc. # 8) be amended as follows: I. Discovery Completed Defendant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (AETNA) filed the joint Administrative Record (AR) with this court on April 4, 2018. II. Discovery Remaining and Reason for Request for Extension Plaintiff's Rule 52 an
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, by and through their undersigned counsel of record that, pursuant to LR 26-4, the Scheduling Order (Doc. # 8) be amended as follows:

I. Discovery Completed

Defendant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (AETNA) filed the joint Administrative Record (AR) with this court on April 4, 2018.

II. Discovery Remaining and Reason for Request for Extension

Plaintiff's Rule 52 and/or Rule 56 Motion is due by May 18, 2018. Defendant's response is due by June 18, 2018, and Plaintiff's reply is due by July 2, 2018. Due to unanticipated scheduling conflicts, Plaintiff's counsel requests a 2-week extension of time to STIP AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES (2ND REQUEST) 1 file Plaintiff's Fed.R.Civ.P. 52/56 Opening Brief.

III. Proposed Discovery Schedule

Plaintiff WILLIAMSON and Defendant AETNA agree and stipulate to the following proposed deadline extensions:

Description: CurrentDeadline: Proposed: Plaintiff's Dispositive ERISA Motion 05/18/18 06/01/18 under Rule 52 and/or 56 Aetna's Response to Dispositive 06/18/18 07/02/18 Motion Plaintiff'sReply 07/02/18 07/16/18

We, the undersigned, represent to the Court that this request for extension is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

WHEREFORE, the parties jointly request that this Court adopt the proposed scheduling deadlines as indicated above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer