Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kreiser v. K & B Steel, 2:16-cv-01361-MMD-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180522a51 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 21, 2018
Latest Update: May 21, 2018
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiffs, Chad Kreiser and Christina Kreiser, by and through their counsel of record, Peter S. Christiansen, Esq., R. Todd Terry, Esq., and Keely A. Perdue, Esq. of Christiansen Law Offices, and Defendant Kiewitt Infrastructure West Co., by and through its counsel of record, J. Bruce Alverson, Esq. and Karie N. Wilson, Esq. of Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders, pursuant
More

AMENDED STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS

(First Request)

Plaintiffs, Chad Kreiser and Christina Kreiser, by and through their counsel of record, Peter S. Christiansen, Esq., R. Todd Terry, Esq., and Keely A. Perdue, Esq. of Christiansen Law Offices, and Defendant Kiewitt Infrastructure West Co., by and through its counsel of record, J. Bruce Alverson, Esq. and Karie N. Wilson, Esq. of Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders, pursuant to LR IA 6-1(b) hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadlines associated with Defendant Kiewit Western Co. d/b/a Lake Mead Constructor's Motion to Dismiss or alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion") filed on May 11, 2018 (Dkt. No. 46), as follows:

WHEREAS, Defendant filed its Motion on May 11, 2018;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' opposition is due on or before May 25, 2018; however, Plaintiff's counsel will be out of the jurisdiction the week the opposition is due;

WHEREAS, Defendant's reply brief would have been due 7 days immediately following the filing of Plaintiffs' opposition.

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that Plaintiffs' opposition shall be due on or before June 8, 2018 to allow Plaintiff's counsel sufficient time to oppose Defendant's Motion on its merits.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that Defendant's reply shall be due on or before June 15, 2018 or 7 days immediately following the filing of Plaintiffs' Opposition, whichever comes first.

This is the first stipulation for extension of time to extend deadlines regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.

This Stipulation is entered into this 17th day of May, 2018.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer