Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Ying Yi Yu, 2:02-CR-674 JCM (NJK). (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180529b09 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 25, 2018
Latest Update: May 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is defendant Ying Yi Yu's motion for release of funds. (ECF No. 963). The government filed a non-opposition response. (ECF No. 968). On May 11, 2009, Judge Pro entered a $482,000,000 restitution order as to defendant. 1 (ECF No. 755). After the order was vacated on appeal, Judge Pro entered a second restitution order of $7,813,905.75. (ECF No. 890). The second restitution order was also vacated on appeal. On August 17, 201
More

ORDER

Presently before the court is defendant Ying Yi Yu's motion for release of funds. (ECF No. 963). The government filed a non-opposition response. (ECF No. 968).

On May 11, 2009, Judge Pro entered a $482,000,000 restitution order as to defendant.1 (ECF No. 755). After the order was vacated on appeal, Judge Pro entered a second restitution order of $7,813,905.75. (ECF No. 890). The second restitution order was also vacated on appeal. On August 17, 2017, this court re-sentenced defendant and ordered no restitution in connection with defendant's conviction. (ECF No. 958). Defendant has made restitution payments totaling $3,307.94 that she asks be refunded to her now that the judgment against her does not include a restitution order. (ECF No. 963).

The government filed a non-opposition response, stating: "[s]ubject to full payment of all outstanding mandatory penalty assessments, the Government does not oppose [defendant's] Motion . . . and agrees that undistributed restitution payments made by the defendant may be returned by the Clerk's Office." (ECF No. 968).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that defendant's motion for release of funds (ECF No. 963) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall refund defendant $3,307.94, less any unpaid mandatory penalty assessments.

FootNotes


1. The restitution order held defendant jointly and severally liable with her co-defendants for $482,000,000.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer