Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Santos, 2:17-CR-00001-JAD-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180601f05 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 31, 2018
Latest Update: May 31, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING AND DISPOSITION JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Defendant, LEONARDO A. OLIVEIRA SANTOS, by and through his counsel, TODD M. LEVENTHAL, ESQ., and the United States of America, by its counsel, JOHN P. BURNS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, that the Sentencing and disposition in the above-captioned matter currently set for Monday, June 11, 2018 be re-set for 60 days out at the courts convenience. This Stipulat
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING AND DISPOSITION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Defendant, LEONARDO A. OLIVEIRA SANTOS, by and through his counsel, TODD M. LEVENTHAL, ESQ., and the United States of America, by its counsel, JOHN P. BURNS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, that the Sentencing and disposition in the above-captioned matter currently set for Monday, June 11, 2018 be re-set for 60 days out at the courts convenience.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons

1. There are pending issues that remain which are vital to the Sentencing and Disposition of Mr. Oliveira-Santos. 2. Mr. Leventhal has spoken to JOHN P. BURNS, Assistant United States Attorney, and he has no objection to continue the hearing. 3. Mr. Oliveira-Santos is currently in custody and agrees with this request. 4. Additionally, denial of this request for a continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court finds that:

1. There are pending issues that remain which are vital to the Sentencing and Disposition of Mr. Oliveira-Santos. 2. Mr. Leventhal has spoken to JOHN P. BURNS, Assistant United States Attorney, and he has no objection to continue the hearing. 3. Mr. Oliveira-Santos is currently in custody and agrees with this request. 4. Additionally, denial of this request for a continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by granting the requested continuance of the current Sentencing date for at least 120 days at a time convenient for the court.

ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS SO ORDERED that the current Sentencing Hearing is vacated and the same is continued and reset for August 13, 2018, at the hour of 11:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer