Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kaylor v. Douglas County, 3:14-cv-00651-MMD-WGC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180608e98 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, the parties, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of time for Plaintiff to oppose Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 43). Said motion was filed on April 16, 2018. The original deadline for filing the Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment was May 7, 2018. Plaintiff previ
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, the parties, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of time for Plaintiff to oppose Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 43). Said motion was filed on April 16, 2018. The original deadline for filing the Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment was May 7, 2018. Plaintiff previously requested a 30 day extension to oppose said motion — which was granted. (ECF No. 44). This extended deadline is today, June 6, 2018. Despite diligence on working on the Opposition, Plaintiff has not been able to complete it and desires an additional fourteen (14) day extension to oppose the motion for summary judgment. For these reasons, the parties stipulate for Plaintiff to have an additional fourteen days from today in which to file his Opposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer