Filed: Jun. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF RESPONSE DEADLINES; ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Dunham Trust Company ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, that the time allowed for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss shall be extended up to and including June 27, 2018. Further, the time allowed for Defendant to reply in support of the Mo
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF RESPONSE DEADLINES; ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Dunham Trust Company ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, that the time allowed for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss shall be extended up to and including June 27, 2018. Further, the time allowed for Defendant to reply in support of the Mot..
More
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF RESPONSE DEADLINES; ORDER (FIRST REQUEST)
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Dunham Trust Company ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, that the time allowed for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss shall be extended up to and including June 27, 2018. Further, the time allowed for Defendant to reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss shall be extended up to and including July 18, 2018.
The Motion to Dismiss was filed and served May 30, 2018. The original deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to Dismiss would be June 13, 2018, with Defendant's reply deadline as July 5, 2018. Good cause exists for the stipulated extension because the parties need additional time to research, evaluate, and respond to the present motion practice. This is the first request to extend the time for the parties with regard to the Motion to Dismiss.
The Court finds and concludes that good cause exists to extend the time for the parties to respond with respect to the Motion to Dismiss. Any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before June 27, 2018 and any reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss shall be field on or before July 18, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
