Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ruiz v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2:17-cv-00944-RFB-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180613965 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs ROBERT NUNEZ RUIZ and TERESA LYNN RUIZ (collectively, "RUIZ"), each appearing in the proper person, and Defendant STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY ("STGC"), by and through its attorneys, Gerrard Cox Larsen, jointly file this Stipulation and Order To Continue Settlement Conference, and state as follows: On March 19, 2018, Defendant STGC's parent company, Stewart Information Services Corpor
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

Plaintiffs ROBERT NUNEZ RUIZ and TERESA LYNN RUIZ (collectively, "RUIZ"), each appearing in the proper person, and Defendant STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY ("STGC"), by and through its attorneys, Gerrard Cox Larsen, jointly file this Stipulation and Order To Continue Settlement Conference, and state as follows:

On March 19, 2018, Defendant STGC's parent company, Stewart Information Services Corporation, entered into an agreement to be acquired by Fidelity National Financial, Inc. ("Fidelity"). The sale of STGC to Fidelity is currently pending. See Affidavit of John M. Langeveld, Esq., attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated by this reference herein.

On April 9, 2018, this Court entered its Order Scheduling A Settlement Conference, which set a settlement conference in this case for Friday, June 8, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. and which required the Parties to submit confidential Settlement Conference Statements by Friday, June 1, 2018, at 12:00 p.m. [ECF No. 25].

Thereafter, on Tuesday, May 29, 2018, counsel for STGC was contacted by STGC, and informed that because of the pending sale, numerous STGC employees had left STGC, leaving no representative to attend the scheduled Settlement Conference. See Ex. "A".

This Court's April 9, 2018 Order Scheduling A Settlement Conference provides in relevant part:

[The] following individual(s) must be present in person for the duration of the settlement conference: 5. If any party is subject to coverage by an insurance carrier, then a representative of the insurance carrier with authority to settle this matter up to the full amount of the claim or last demand.

See [ECF No. 25].

Upon learning of this unforeseeable issue, STGC's counsel immediately contacted the Court's staff to determine if an STGC representative could participate by telephone in the Settlement Conference. Ex. "A". STGC's counsel was informed that the Court would not permit this, leaving STGC with no choice but to seek a new date when a representative could appear in person. Ex. "A".

The above being the case, the Parties now hereby stipulate and agree, as follows:

1. Because an STGC representative is unable to attend the Settlement Conference currently set for Friday, June 8, 2018, at 8:30 a.m., the Parties now hereby stipulate and agree that it is necessary to continue the Settlement Conference to a later date, so that STGC's representative will be able to attend the Settlement Conference in person, per the Court's Order.

2. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to reschedule the Settlement Conference to Tuesday, August 21, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. Furthermore, in accordance with the schedule set forth in the Court's Order Scheduling A Settlement Conference, the Parties shall submit their confidential Settlement Conference Statements one week prior to the Settlement Conference, no later than Tuesday, August 14, 2018, at 12:00 p.m.

3. In addition, because of the Parties' need to continue the Settlement Conference date, the Parties also hereby stipulate and agree to extend the following, operative Pre-Trial deadlines [ECF No. 16 — Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery Deadlines], by an additional 90 days, as follows:

Description of Deadline Old Date New Date Dispositive Motions 07/18/2018 10/16/2018 Joint Pre-Trial Order 08/29/2018 11/27/20181

4. A trial date has not yet been set in this matter. Because of the Parties' need to continue the Settlement Conference date, the Parties also hereby stipulate and agree to amend their trial availability dates, previously set forth in their Joint Interim Status Report [ECF No. 26], by an additional 90 days, as follows:

Available Trial Dates: Old Date New Date Sept. 17, 2018 - Sept. 19, 2018 Jan. 2, 2019 - Jan. 4, 2019 Sept. 24, 2018 - Sept. 26, 2018 Jan. 7, 2019 - Jan. 9, 2019 Oct. 1, 2018 - Oct. 3, 2018 Jan. 14, 2019 - Jan. 16, 2019

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation of the Parties, and finding good, just, and sufficient cause therefore, it its hereby entered as an Order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

EXHIBIT A

Douglas D. Gerrard, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 4613 dgerrard@gerrard-cox.com John M. Langeveld, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11628 jlangeveld@gerrard-cox.com GERRARD COX & LARSEN 2450 St. Rose Parkway, Suite #200 Henderson, NV 89074 Telephone: (702) 796-4000 Facsimile: (702) 796-4848 Attorneys for Defendant STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ROBERT NUNEZ RUIZ, an Individual; and TERESA LYNN RUIZ, an Individual, Case No. 2:17-cv-00944-RFB-CWH Plaintiffs, vs. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation; STEWART TITLE COMPANY, a Texas Corporation; DOE DEFENDANTS 1 through 10; and ROE ENTITIES 1 through 10. Defendants.

AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN M. LANGEVELD, ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

I, John M. Langeveld, Esq., of the law firm GERRARD COX & LARSEN, do hereby swear under penalty of perjury that the following assertions are true to the best of my knowledge and belief, and as provided to me by my client:

1. Affiant is an attorney for Defendant STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY in this matter.

2. That by and through my own personal knowledge, recollection, and involvement of the matters related thereto, and asserted herein, that I am familiar with and have knowledge relating to the following, as set forth below.

3. On or about March 19, 2018, STGC informed our office that STGC's parent company, Stewart Information Services Corporation, had entered into an agreement to be acquired by Fidelity National Financial, Inc. ("Fidelity"). The sale of STGC to Fidelity is currently pending.

4. On Tuesday, May 29, 2018, I was contacted via telephone by STGC and informed that because of the pending sale, numerous STGC employees had left STGC, which left no available representative to attend the June 8, 2018, Settlement Conference.

5. Upon learning of this unforeseeable issue, I immediately contacted Judge Hoffman's chambers to inquire if an STGC representative could participate by telephone in the Settlement Conference.

6. I was informed by Judge Hoffman's staff that the Judge would not permit STGC's representative to participate by telephone, and was provided with alternative dates in August, 2018, to reschedule the Settlement Conference for a later date when STGC's representative could attend.

7. Further your Affiant sayeth naught.

John M. Langeveld, Esq. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 4th day of June, 2018. NOTARY PUBLIC

FootNotes


1. The Parties request that, in the event the Court's decision on any pending motion for summary judgment has not been made, or if additional dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the joint pretrial order be suspended until thirty (30) days after a decision on the dispositive motions. This is consistent with the terms of the Court's original Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (filed Aug. 8, 2017) [Doc. 9].
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer