Filed: Jun. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendants, OMICS GROUP INC., IMEDPUB LLC, CONFERENCE SERIES LLC, and SRINUBABU GEDELA, by and through counsel of record, D. Neal Tomlinson and Kristina R. Kleist, and Plaintiff, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, by and through counsel of record, Gregory A. Ashe and Michael E. Tankersley, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Compel on May 9, 2018 (Dkt. Nos.
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendants, OMICS GROUP INC., IMEDPUB LLC, CONFERENCE SERIES LLC, and SRINUBABU GEDELA, by and through counsel of record, D. Neal Tomlinson and Kristina R. Kleist, and Plaintiff, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, by and through counsel of record, Gregory A. Ashe and Michael E. Tankersley, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Compel on May 9, 2018 (Dkt. Nos. ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants, OMICS GROUP INC., IMEDPUB LLC, CONFERENCE SERIES LLC, and SRINUBABU GEDELA, by and through counsel of record, D. Neal Tomlinson and Kristina R. Kleist, and Plaintiff, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, by and through counsel of record, Gregory A. Ashe and Michael E. Tankersley, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Compel on May 9, 2018 (Dkt. Nos. 92, 94), responses due on May 23, 2018.
2. This Court granted stipulations for extensions of time (Dkt. Nos. 98 and 100) extending the due date for the response to June 8, 2018.
3. Defense counsel has been dealing with multiple family medical issues that have required counsel to be out of the office, and additional time is needed to confer with Defendants and respond to Plaintiff's Motions.
4. In addition, additional time is necessary due to the fact that all Defendants are located in India, and that language, time zones and geographical barriers have presented significant challenges in that defense counsel has encountered difficulty explaining and communicating with the Defendants regarding the many issues and complexities of the pending motions.
5. Plaintiff's counsel has agreed to extend the response date to June 22, 2018.
6. This Stipulation is being made in good faith between and at the request of both parties, and not for purposes of delay.
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the deadline for Defendants to file their responses to the Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Compel is hereby extended to June 22, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
