Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Caesars Entertainment Corp., 2:18-cv-00862-MMD-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180615e36
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (First Request) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC and Defendant Caesars Entertainment Corp., by and through their undersigned counsel, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Co
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (First Request) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC and Defendant Caesars Entertainment Corp., by and through their undersigned counsel, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Com..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (First Request)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC and Defendant Caesars Entertainment Corp., by and through their undersigned counsel, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, to and including July 16, 2018,1 and request that the Court enter an Order approving the same.
The extension is sought because Plaintiff's Complaint asserts patent infringement against Defendant and raises potential issues of liability and damages. Defendant only recently retained litigation counsel and counsel has begun to analyze these issues and reasonably requires additional time to evaluate the claims and potential defenses and to prepare Defendant's response to the Complaint. Defendant has not requested any prior extensions from the Court and this extension request is made in the interests of justice and not for the purposes of delay.
Based on the foregoing, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter an order extending the deadline for Defendant to plead or otherwise respond to the Complaint until July 16, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Defendant was served on May 25, 2018, and its responsive pleading is currently due by June 15, 2018.
Source: Leagle
