Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Peccole-Nevada Corporation v. American Home Assurance Company, 2:18-cv-00791-JCM-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180618a06 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONDENT AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STAY THIS ACTION PENDING RESOLUTION OF A MORE COMPLETE ACTION PENDING IN NEW YORK (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION Plaintiffs Peccole-Nevada Corporation and Queensridge Highrise, LLC (collectively, " Plaintiffs ") and Respondent American H
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONDENT AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STAY THIS ACTION PENDING RESOLUTION OF A MORE COMPLETE ACTION PENDING IN NEW YORK

(First Request)

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION

Plaintiffs Peccole-Nevada Corporation and Queensridge Highrise, LLC (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Respondent American Home Assurance Company ("American Home" and together with Plaintiffs the "Parties"), by and through their counsel, respectfully submit the following Stipulation to allow American Home until on or before June 29, 2018 to file a reply in support of Respondent's Motion to Transfer to the Southern Distirct of New York or in the alternative to Stay this Action Pending Resolution of a More Complete Action Pending in New York ("Motion to Transfer").

1. On May 25, 2018, American Home filed a Motion to Transfer (ECF No. 16) and served a copy thereof on Plaintiffs.

2. On June 8, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Response to Respondent's Motion to Transfer (ECF No. 20) and served a copy thereof on American Home.

3. American Home's deadline to reply is June 15, 2018.

4. This is the first stipulation for extension of time to file a Reply to Plaintiffs'

Response to Respondent's Motion to Transfer (ECF No. 20).

5. Good cause for the stipulation exists. The Parties have entered into so-ordered stipulations providing for reciprocal extensions of time in multiple related actions currently pending in Nevada and New York for similar motions to allow for consistency in their arguments. The Parties respectfully request the extension in this action in order to ensure that the Court receive a full and accurate briefing of the motion before it.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer