Opromollo v. Mandaly Corp., 2:17-cv-01409-VCF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180619b31
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's Response to Notice of Non-Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40). This response will be treated as a motion for an extension of time. Plaintiff has given sufficient reason to grant an extension to June 25, 2018 to file an opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28). Accordingly, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any opposition to the Motion for Summary Jud
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's Response to Notice of Non-Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40). This response will be treated as a motion for an extension of time. Plaintiff has given sufficient reason to grant an extension to June 25, 2018 to file an opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28). Accordingly, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any opposition to the Motion for Summary Judg..
More
ORDER
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Response to Notice of Non-Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40). This response will be treated as a motion for an extension of time. Plaintiff has given sufficient reason to grant an extension to June 25, 2018 to file an opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28).
Accordingly, and for good cause shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28) must be filed on or before June 25, 2018.
Source: Leagle
