Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pichardo v. Amerigroup Corporation, 2:17-cv-00276-RFB-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180620d70 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel (ECF No. 42), filed on May 29, 2018. Defendant filed a response (ECF No. 44) on June 12, 2018. Under Local Rule 26-7(b), all motions to compel discovery must set forth in full the text of the discovery originally sought and any response to it. In her motion, plaintiff does not set forth the full text of the discovery originally sought, nor does she include the respon
More

ORDER

Presently before the Court is plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel (ECF No. 42), filed on May 29, 2018. Defendant filed a response (ECF No. 44) on June 12, 2018.

Under Local Rule 26-7(b), all motions to compel discovery must set forth in full the text of the discovery originally sought and any response to it. In her motion, plaintiff does not set forth the full text of the discovery originally sought, nor does she include the responses to each disputed request. In order to determine the nature and extent of the dispute, the Court requires, within the motion, a description of each disputed discovery request along with an explanation of the status of the dispute after the meet and confer conferences.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 42) is DENIED without prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer