Rock v. Ninyo & Moore, Geotechnical Consultants, 2:17-cv-01676-APG-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180621818
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC. ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, that the above-captioned matter be dismissed with prejudice as to defendant ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC., with each party to bear their own costs. IT IS SO O
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC. ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, that the above-captioned matter be dismissed with prejudice as to defendant ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC., with each party to bear their own costs. IT IS SO OR..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC.
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, that the above-captioned matter be dismissed with prejudice as to defendant ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC., with each party to bear their own costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
