Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:15-cv-00800-GMN-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180621e07 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE PENDING DECISION ON STIPULATION TO STAY [ECF NO. 68] (FIRST REQUEST) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), by and through its attorneys of record, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), by and through its attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to an extension of time of the deadline to file dispositive motions pending the outcome on the Stipulation and Order to Stay Litigating Pending
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE PENDING DECISION ON STIPULATION TO STAY [ECF NO. 68]

(FIRST REQUEST)

SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), by and through its attorneys of record, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), by and through its attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to an extension of time of the deadline to file dispositive motions pending the outcome on the Stipulation and Order to Stay Litigating Pending Final Resolution of the Certified Question Before the Nevada Supreme Court [ECF No. 68], filed on May 24, 2018. The current dispositive motion deadline is June 7, 2018 pursuant to this Court's minute order entered on May 17, 2018 [ECF No. 67]. In order to conserve judicial resources, as well as the time and effort of the parties, this extension is appropriate and not for the purposes of undue delay. The parties hereby request that the deadline to file dispositive motions be continued to two (2) calendar weeks following this Courts decision on the Stipulation to Stay [ECF No. 68]. Further, any opposition to any dispositive motions filed on or before the extended deadline will be due 21 calendar days following the extended deadline to file dispositive motions. Any replies will be filed in the ordinary course.

Following the decision on the Stipulation to Stay, the parties stipulate that Wells Fargo may supplement or amend any dispositive motion it files before the decision of the Certified Question.

Good cause exists to grant this stipulation for an extension of the dispositive deadline as the Stipulation to Stay is pending, which would ultimately stay the dispositive motion deadline. More so, should the Stipulation to Stay be granted, the extension will avoid unnecessary briefing and re-briefing once the Certified Question is decided.

This is the parties' first request for the extension of this deadline and it is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice any party to this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer