Filed: Jun. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant INTERVAL EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS, and Plaintiff MINNIE MOORE RESOURCES, INC., by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree, pursuant to an agreement reached on June 20, 2018, as follows: 1. On June 4, 2018, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [ECF No.18]; 2. On June 18
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant INTERVAL EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS, and Plaintiff MINNIE MOORE RESOURCES, INC., by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree, pursuant to an agreement reached on June 20, 2018, as follows: 1. On June 4, 2018, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [ECF No.18]; 2. On June 18,..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
(First Request)
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Defendant INTERVAL EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS, and Plaintiff MINNIE MOORE RESOURCES, INC., by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree, pursuant to an agreement reached on June 20, 2018, as follows:
1. On June 4, 2018, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [ECF No.18];
2. On June 18, 2018, Plaintiff filed its Response to the Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 20];
3. Defendant initially had until June 25, 2018 to file its Reply to Plaintiff's Response to the Motion to Dismiss;
4. Due to Defendant's counsel being out-of-state, additional time is needed to file the Reply; therefore, Defendant shall now have up to and including July 2, 2018 to file its Reply to Plaintiff's Response to the Motion to Dismiss; and
5. This is the first stipulation to extend the deadline to file the Reply to the Response to the Motion to Dismiss. This stipulation is made in good faith and not to delay the proceedings.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
