Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Banerjee v. Continental Incorporated, Inc., 2:17-cv-00466-APG-GWF (LEAD). (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180702b79 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' REPLY (Docket No. 68). (First Request to Extend this Deadline) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendants, CONTINENTAL INCORPORATED, INC. d/b/a CONTINENTAL ENTERPRISES and LEAPERS, INC. filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 68), on June 15, 2018, in the above-entitled action. Plaintiffs, ADRISH BANERJEE and YAN HE's Response is currently due Monday, July 2, 2019. This is
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' REPLY (Docket No. 68).

(First Request to Extend this Deadline)

Defendants, CONTINENTAL INCORPORATED, INC. d/b/a CONTINENTAL ENTERPRISES and LEAPERS, INC. filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 68), on June 15, 2018, in the above-entitled action. Plaintiffs, ADRISH BANERJEE and YAN HE's Response is currently due Monday, July 2, 2019. This is the first request to extend this deadline.

The parties hereto, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of up to and including, Thursday, July 19, 2018. Defendants shall have until Monday, July 30, 2018 to file their Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.

The reasons for this request are the following:

1. Plaintiffs' counsel was involved in a car accident that was caused by an apparent intoxicated motorist. As a result, he has been required to take a number of days off in order to seek treatment, including actively attending physical therapy appointments and diagnostic testing, in order to recover, thus creating a backlog of deadlines and tasks to complete. He is also expected to miss additional time from work as the treatment continues.

2. Additionally, with the arguments raised in Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs require additional time within which to properly and thoroughly respond to same. Plaintiffs' counsel is requesting approximately three (3) additional weeks to file and serve its Response to Defendants' Motion (Docket No. 68).

3. This Stipulation is entered into in good faith and not to cause undue delay.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, in the above-entitled matter (Docket No.: 68) is due on Thursday, July 19, 2018 and Defendants shall have until Monday, July 30, 2018 to file their Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer