Filed: Jun. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SAN MARINO PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee for GSAA 2006-1 and SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. ("Plaintiffs"), Defendant/Counterclaimant, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), and Defendant, San Marino Pr
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SAN MARINO PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee for GSAA 2006-1 and SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. ("Plaintiffs"), Defendant/Counterclaimant, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), and Defendant, San Marino Pro..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SAN MARINO PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(First Request)
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee for GSAA 2006-1 and SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. ("Plaintiffs"), Defendant/Counterclaimant, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), and Defendant, San Marino Property Owners Association (the "Association") (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree extend the date for responses to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 46] and the Association's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 45] from the current due date of June 29, 2018, to September 6, 2018, the dispositive motions deadline set forth in the Stipulation and Order entered on June 11, 2018 [ECF No. 49]. This is the first request to extend the deadline to respond to the two motions for summary judgment.
1. On June 8, 2018, the Parties filed a Stipulation and Order to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline for the limited purpose of taking Plaintiffs' 30(b)(6) depositions. [ECF No. 48].
2. On June 8, 2018, Plaintiffs' filed their Motion for Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 46].
3. On June 8, 2018, the Association filed its Motion for Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 45].
4. On June 11, 2018, the Stipulation and Order to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline, Limiting Extension of the Discovery Deadline and to Amend Scheduling Order [ECF No. 30] was entered by the Court. [ECF No. 49].
5. The depositions of Plaintiffs', which were the basis of the stipulation and order to extend the dispositive motions deadline, are scheduled to occur on June 28, 2018.
6. The responses to the motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs' [ECF No. 46] and the Association [ECF No. 45] are currently due on June 29, 2018.
7. The Parties have agreed to extend the deadline for responses to the pending motions for summary judgment [ECF No.'s 45, 46] to September 6, 2018, the dispositive motions deadline.
8. Extending this deadline will allow the Parties to obtain deposition transcripts and allow the parties to fully address the issues in this case and to incorporate any deposition testimony as necessary.
9. Also, extending this deadline will harmonize the briefing schedule with LR 7-2.
10. This is the first request for an enlargement of time of the briefing schedule.
11. This request is not made for any deleterious purpose or to cause delay, but is made in good faith by the Parties and in the interests of efficiency and judicial economy.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the deadline to file responses to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 46] and the Association's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 45] shall be extended to September 6, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
