Stiers v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation, 2:18-cv-01042-RFB-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180703c92
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules 6-2, 7-1, Plaintiff Joseph Stiers and Defendants Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Caesars Entertainment Operating Company and Caesars Interactive Entertainment ("Defendants"), stipulate that Defendants' deadline to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended from July 5, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules 6-2, 7-1, Plaintiff Joseph Stiers and Defendants Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Caesars Entertainment Operating Company and Caesars Interactive Entertainment ("Defendants"), stipulate that Defendants' deadline to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended from July 5, 2018 t..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules 6-2, 7-1, Plaintiff Joseph Stiers and Defendants Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Caesars Entertainment Operating Company and Caesars Interactive Entertainment ("Defendants"), stipulate that Defendants' deadline to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended from July 5, 2018 through and including July 19, 2018. Plaintiff consents to the extension.
Good cause exists for the extension given that Defendants recently retained counsel and are still investigating Plaintiff's allegations against them. Defendants expect that by July 19, 2018, it will be in a position to respond to the Complaint.
It is further agreed that nothing in this stipulation shall be deemed to waive or prejudice any claims or defenses of any party to this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle