Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Alexander, 2:17-cr-72-RFB-1. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180703d03 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING TO DEFENDANT VONTEAK ALEXANDER'S SEALED MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between DAYLE ELIESON, United States Attorney, and Elham Roohani, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and PAUL RIDDLE, counsel for defendant VONTEAK ALEXANDER, that the parties' simultaneous supplemental briefing to the Sealed Motions to Suppress in the above-cap
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING TO DEFENDANT VONTEAK ALEXANDER'S SEALED MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between DAYLE ELIESON, United States Attorney, and Elham Roohani, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and PAUL RIDDLE, counsel for defendant VONTEAK ALEXANDER, that the parties' simultaneous supplemental briefing to the Sealed Motions to Suppress in the above-captioned matter, which is currently set for, July 6, 2018, be continued to July 20, 2018.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. The parties have only recently received the relevant transcripts of the final hearing and need additional time to prepare their arguments.

2. Defense Counsel does not object to the continuance.

3. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

4. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but to allow for adequate and efficient response time.

5. This is the first request for a continuance of deadline for the parties' simultaneous supplemental briefing to the Sealed Motions to Suppress.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby finds that:

1. The parties have only recently received the relevant transcripts of the final hearing and need additional time to prepare their arguments.

2. Defense Counsel does not object to the continuance.

3. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

4. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but to allow for adequate and efficient response time.

5. This is the first request for a continuance of deadline for the parties' simultaneous supplemental briefing to the Sealed Motions to Suppress.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Based on the fact that the parties have agreed to the continuance; and based on the fact that denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice, the Court hereby concludes that:

The ends of justice are served by granting said continuance, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice and would deny adequate response time, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadline for the parties' simultaneous supplemental briefing to the Sealed Motions to Suppress is hereby reset to July 20, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer