O'Connell v. American Express Company, 2:18-cv-00743-RFB-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180706995
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2018
Summary: Stipulation for an extension of time for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 27] (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff Thomas A. O'Connell ("Plaintiff") and Bank of America ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby submit this stipulation for an extension of time—until July 18, 2018 —for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, filed on June 20, 2018, ECF No. 27. Plaintiff's
Summary: Stipulation for an extension of time for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 27] (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff Thomas A. O'Connell ("Plaintiff") and Bank of America ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby submit this stipulation for an extension of time—until July 18, 2018 —for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, filed on June 20, 2018, ECF No. 27. Plaintiff's R..
More
Stipulation for an extension of time for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 27]
(First Request)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas A. O'Connell ("Plaintiff") and Bank of America ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby submit this stipulation for an extension of time—until July 18, 2018—for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, filed on June 20, 2018, ECF No. 27. Plaintiff's Response is currently due on July 4, 2018. Id.
In good faith and not for the purposes of delay, Plaintiff has requested and Defendant has agreed to allow Plaintiff an additional 14 days to respond to the Motion. Plaintiff requested the extension to allow counsel to properly respond to Defendant's motion and to allow additional time for the parties to discuss possible resolution. The Parties in good faith stipulate to allow additional time for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion. This is the first request for an extension of this deadline.
The Parties therefore stipulate that Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion to dismiss, ECF. No. 27, shall be due on or before July 18, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
