Leonardo v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00279-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180706a24
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from July 5, 2018 to August 15, 2018 . This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel had a death of a
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from July 5, 2018 to August 15, 2018 . This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel had a death of a ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from July 5, 2018 to August 15, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel had a death of a family member and is attending prayer services in the next few weeks. In addition, Counsel has over 85+ pending social security cases, which require two or more dispositive motions a week until mid-August. Due to current workload demands and upcoming leave, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
Defendant shall have until August 15, 2018 to respond to
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: plaintiff's Motion for Reversal and Remand (ECF No. 18).
Source: Leagle
