Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dey v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 2:18-cv-00502-RFB-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180706a33 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jul. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [SECOND REQUEST] RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff Robert D. Dey ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel of record, and Trans Union LLC ("Trans Union") have agreed and stipulated to the following: 1. On March 19, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1]. 2. On May 11, 2018, Trans Union filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF Dkt. 12]. 3. On May 25, 2018, Plaintiff filed an
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS

[SECOND REQUEST]

Plaintiff Robert D. Dey ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel of record, and Trans Union LLC ("Trans Union") have agreed and stipulated to the following:

1. On March 19, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1].

2. On May 11, 2018, Trans Union filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF Dkt. 12].

3. On May 25, 2018, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 17].

4. On June 4, 2018 Trans Union filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint

[ECF Dkt. 19].

5. On June 18, 2018, the Court granted the parties' first stipulation for extension of time. ECF Dkt. 24.

6. Plaintiff's Response is due July 9, 2018.

7. Plaintiff and Trans Union have agreed to extend Plaintiff's response an additional fourteen days in order to allow the parties to further discuss possible resolution of this matter. Given the intervening Fourth of July holiday, it may not be possible to conclude negotiations prior to the time the response is due on July 9. As a result, both Plaintiff and Trans Union hereby request this Court to further extend the date for Plaintiff to respond to Trans Union's Motion to Dismiss Complaint until July 23, 2018. This is the second request for seeking an extension, and is not made for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer