Filed: Jul. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, REGINA FORD ("Regina"), by and through her attorney, JENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ., of the law firm HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP, and Defendant, CAESARS ENTERPRISES SERVICES, LLC, A Foreign Limited Liability Company, ("Caesars"), by and through its attorney, SANDRA KETNER, ESQ., of LIT
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, REGINA FORD ("Regina"), by and through her attorney, JENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ., of the law firm HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP, and Defendant, CAESARS ENTERPRISES SERVICES, LLC, A Foreign Limited Liability Company, ("Caesars"), by and through its attorney, SANDRA KETNER, ESQ., of LITT..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, REGINA FORD ("Regina"), by and through her attorney, JENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ., of the law firm HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP, and Defendant, CAESARS ENTERPRISES SERVICES, LLC, A Foreign Limited Liability Company, ("Caesars"), by and through its attorney, SANDRA KETNER, ESQ., of LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. and hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. That the Reply to the Defendant's Opposition to the Motion to Amend the Complaint that is due on July 16th, 2018, will now be due on July 18th, 2018.
2. This request for an extension of time is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay. The request is due to a scheduling conflict in Plaintiff's counsel's schedule. This is the first request for an extension of time with respect to the Reply brief associated with Defendant's Opposition.
ORDER
The Court having reviewed the foregoing STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT in the above-entitled matter and for good cause appearing therefor,
IT IS SO ORDERED that the Reply to Defendant's Opposition to the Motion to Amend the Complaint shall be due on July 18th, 2018.