Banks v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02554-JAD-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180720b85
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER (Docket Nos. 21, 22) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court are Defendant's motion for access to sealed document and motion to extend time to respond to Plaintiff's motion to remand. Docket Nos. 21, 22. Defendant submits that she is unable to access the document filed as an exhibit to Plaintiff's motion to remand at Docket No. 20-1, which is filed under seal. Docket No. 21 at 2. After the filing of the instant motions, the Court was made aware by the Clerk's Off
Summary: ORDER (Docket Nos. 21, 22) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court are Defendant's motion for access to sealed document and motion to extend time to respond to Plaintiff's motion to remand. Docket Nos. 21, 22. Defendant submits that she is unable to access the document filed as an exhibit to Plaintiff's motion to remand at Docket No. 20-1, which is filed under seal. Docket No. 21 at 2. After the filing of the instant motions, the Court was made aware by the Clerk's Offi..
More
ORDER
(Docket Nos. 21, 22)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendant's motion for access to sealed document and motion to extend time to respond to Plaintiff's motion to remand. Docket Nos. 21, 22. Defendant submits that she is unable to access the document filed as an exhibit to Plaintiff's motion to remand at Docket No. 20-1, which is filed under seal. Docket No. 21 at 2. After the filing of the instant motions, the Court was made aware by the Clerk's Office that counsel for Defendant now has access to the document at issue.
Additionally, Defendant asks the Court for a 60-day extension to file her response to Plaintiff's motion to remand. Docket No. 22; see also Docket No. 20. Defendant submits that she requires additional time "to review the document and prepare her response" because she cannot access the document attached to Plaintiff's motion to remand. Docket No. 22 at 2.
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant's motion for access to sealed document as moot. Docket No. 21. For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to extend time. Docket No. 22. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's motion to remand is due on or before September 24, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
