Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Pilgrim, 2:14-CR-119-JCM-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180723a18 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Dayle Elieson, Acting United States Attorney, and Daniel J. Cowhig, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Paul D. Riddle, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Daniel Pilgrim, Jr., that the Revocation Hearing currently scheduled on July 20, 2018, be v
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE REVOCATION HEARING (First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Dayle Elieson, Acting United States Attorney, and Daniel J. Cowhig, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Paul D. Riddle, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Daniel Pilgrim, Jr., that the Revocation Hearing currently scheduled on July 20, 2018, be vacated and continued to a date and time convenient to the Court, but no sooner than sixty (60) days.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons

1. Mr. Pilgrim has a pending petition alleging a violation of his federal supervision. The alleged violation is a new crime which is currently pending in state court. The parties wish to continue the hearing regarding Mr. Pilgrim's revocation of supervision in order to determine whether it would be appropriate to reach a global resolution as to the new charge and the alleged violation.

2. Since the state proceeding is inexorably linked to the allegations contained in the petition, the parties agree to the need for continuance.

3. Therefore, a 60 day continuance is requested to allow Mr. Pilgrim sufficient time to determine whether a global resolution can be reached.

4. Defendant is incarcerated, but does not object to a continuance.

5. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the revocation hearing currently scheduled for Friday July 20, 2018 at 10:00 a.m., be vacated and continued to October 1, 2018 at the hour of 10:30 a.m.; or to a time and date convenient to the court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer