Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. First 100, LLC, 3:17-cv-00062-MMD-WGC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180723a78 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of August 1, 2005 Park Place Securities, Inc. Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-WHQ4 ("Wells Fargo"), and Defendant, Canyon Hills Landscaping Maintenance Asso
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(FIRST REQUEST)

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of August 1, 2005 Park Place Securities, Inc. Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-WHQ4 ("Wells Fargo"), and Defendant, Canyon Hills Landscaping Maintenance Association, Inc. ("HOA") (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

On May 29, 2018, Wells Fargo filed its Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 50]. HOA filed its Response to Wells Fargo's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 57] on July 6, 2018. Presently, Wells Fargo's Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment is due by July 20, 2018.

WHEREAS, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Wells Fargo to file its Reply to August 3, 2018.

This is the first stipulation for extension of time for Wells Fargo to file its Reply to HOA's Response. The parties are requesting an extension of the deadline so that the parties have additional time to fully brief the Court in this matter. The extension is requested in good faith and is not for purposes of delay or prejudice to any other party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer