Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Ausbie, 2:16-cr-00155-JCM-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180724954 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR TURNOVER OF SEIZED FUNDS TO CLERK OF COURT JAMES C. MAHAN , Magistrate Judge . The United States of America ("Government") and Defendant Joel Kenneth Ausbie ("Ausbie"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the $19,594 seized from Ausbie at or near the time of his arrest, which funds are currently in the possession of the FBI, shall be turned over by the FBI to the Clerk of Court for application toward
More

STIPULATION FOR TURNOVER OF SEIZED FUNDS TO CLERK OF COURT

The United States of America ("Government") and Defendant Joel Kenneth Ausbie ("Ausbie"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the $19,594 seized from Ausbie at or near the time of his arrest, which funds are currently in the possession of the FBI, shall be turned over by the FBI to the Clerk of Court for application toward Ausbie's restitution order.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the funds shall be held by the Clerk of Court and shall not be disbursed until further order of this Court and/or the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and/or stipulation of the parties.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that upon approval of this stipulation by the Court, the Government's Motion for Turnover and Application of Seized Funds to Restitution, ECF No. 174, may be deemed withdrawn.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the restitution order against Ausbie is a final order notwithstanding the fact that the judgment is currently on appeal. See Ninth Circuit Case No. 18-10053; see also 18 U.S.C. § 3664(o). This stipulation does not operate as a stay of the judgment nor does it preclude the United States from pursuing all available remedies to collect on the judgment. It is agreed, however, that any additional funds paid by Ausbie or collected by the United States shall be held by the Clerk of Court until the appeal is resolved and/or further order of this Court. The reason for this stipulation is the parties' recognition that the pending appeal could impact the amount and/or validity of restitution ordered. See 18 U.S.C § 3664(o)(1)(B). The parties further acknowledge that the restitution order was made payable jointly and severally between Ausbie and his co-defendants, meaning that any amount received from other co-defendants shall inure as a credit to the restitution amount owed by Ausbie.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that by entering into this stipulation Ausbie is not conceding any issues of fact or law, or making any factual admissions regarding the prosecution in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer