Harlow v. Nevada Property 1 LLC, 2:17-cv-02082-RFB-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180725d23
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE (First Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . The above-referenced parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the Dispositive Motion deadline currently set for August 14, 2018, for an additional thirty days (30) days, until September 14, 2018. This is the first requested extension between the parties. The extension is being requested as discovery in this matter was voluminous, de
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE (First Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . The above-referenced parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the Dispositive Motion deadline currently set for August 14, 2018, for an additional thirty days (30) days, until September 14, 2018. This is the first requested extension between the parties. The extension is being requested as discovery in this matter was voluminous, dep..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE
(First Request)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
The above-referenced parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate to extend the Dispositive Motion deadline currently set for August 14, 2018, for an additional thirty days (30) days, until September 14, 2018. This is the first requested extension between the parties. The extension is being requested as discovery in this matter was voluminous, deposition transcripts have only recently been received, and Defendant LVMPD's Counsel anticipates that additional time will be needed to prepare a dispositive motion. In addition, the Plaintiff's counsel wishes to discuss settlement with counsel for the Defendants. As such, the parties believe good cause exists for an extension of the deadline.
This request is timely. The extension will not prejudice any party and will allow the parties to properly brief their dispositive motions for this Court and allow the parties to discuss the possibility of settlement. The parties are not delaying the conclusion of this matter by way of trial or otherwise; no trial date has yet been ordered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
