Hermansen v. Nevada, 3:17-cv-00135-MMD-VPC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180725d41
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Before the Court is Petitioner's motion for leave to file Exhibit 1 under seal (ECF No. 22). Exhibit 1 is Petitioner's presentence investigation report, which is a confidential document. In accordance with the requirements of Kamakana v. City and Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), the Court finds that a compelling need to protect the privacy and/or personal identifying information of Petitioner in the sealed exhibit outweighs the public
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Before the Court is Petitioner's motion for leave to file Exhibit 1 under seal (ECF No. 22). Exhibit 1 is Petitioner's presentence investigation report, which is a confidential document. In accordance with the requirements of Kamakana v. City and Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), the Court finds that a compelling need to protect the privacy and/or personal identifying information of Petitioner in the sealed exhibit outweighs the public ..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Before the Court is Petitioner's motion for leave to file Exhibit 1 under seal (ECF No. 22). Exhibit 1 is Petitioner's presentence investigation report, which is a confidential document. In accordance with the requirements of Kamakana v. City and Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), the Court finds that a compelling need to protect the privacy and/or personal identifying information of Petitioner in the sealed exhibit outweighs the public interest in open access to court records.
It is therefore ordered that the motion for leave to file Exhibit 1 under seal (ECF No. 22) is granted.
Source: Leagle
