Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Sundell, 3:18-cv-0215-HDM-VPC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180727971 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 1) (SECOND REQUEST) VALERIE P. COOKE , Magistrate Judge . COME NOW the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendant to file his response to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1), said response being due on July 6, 2018 ( See ECF No. 6), be extended until August 6, 2018. Reason for Extension Due to the complexity of
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 1)

(SECOND REQUEST)

COME NOW the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendant to file his response to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1), said response being due on July 6, 2018 (See ECF No. 6), be extended until August 6, 2018.

Reason for Extension

Due to the complexity of the claims and issues alleged in Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendant continues to need additional time to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint. Additionally, the parties are in settlement discussions, which, if successful, would obviate the need for Defendant to respond to the Complaint.

This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of unnecessarily delaying these proceedings. This is the second extension of time requested by counsel for filing Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Complaint.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer