O'Neill v. Baker, 3:11-cv-00901-MMD-VPC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180801e20
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA DU , District Judge . This action is Christopher O'Neill's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Before the Court are motions for extension of time by both parties. The Court finds that there is good cause to grant both motions. It is therefore ordered that Respondents' motion to extend time to file an answer (ECF No. 75) and Petitioner's motion to extend time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF No. 77) are both granted nunc pro tunc.
ORDER
MIRANDA DU, District Judge.
This action is Christopher O'Neill's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Before the Court are motions for extension of time by both parties. The Court finds that there is good cause to grant both motions.
It is therefore ordered that Respondents' motion to extend time to file an answer (ECF No. 75) and Petitioner's motion to extend time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF No. 77) are both granted nunc pro tunc.
Source: Leagle
