Harris v. Experian Information Solutions, 2:18-cv-1292-GMN-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180802b74
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 6) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulation to extend time for Defendant Trans Union, LLC to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint. Docket No. 6. Local Rule IA 6-1(a) requires that the parties "state the reasons for the extension requested." The parties fail to abide by this rule. Id. Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice the parties' stipulation to extend time. Docket No. 6. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
(Docket No. 6)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulation to extend time for Defendant Trans Union, LLC to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint. Docket No. 6. Local Rule IA 6-1(a) requires that the parties "state the reasons for the extension requested." The parties fail to abide by this rule. Id.
Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice the parties' stipulation to extend time. Docket No. 6.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
