TRAF Intercontinental Elektronik-Handels GmbH v. Sonocine, Inc., 3:17-cv-00672-LRH-WGC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180806a48
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER'S AMENDED PETITION (FIRST REQUEST) LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Defendant/Respondent SONOCINE, INC. ("SonoCine") and Plaintiff/Petitioner TRAF INTERCONTINENTAL ELEKTRONIK-HANDELS GmbH ("TRAF"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the time for SonoCine to file its response to TRAF's Amended Petition [Doc 25] from the current deadline of August 1, 2018, to and
Summary: ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER'S AMENDED PETITION (FIRST REQUEST) LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Defendant/Respondent SONOCINE, INC. ("SonoCine") and Plaintiff/Petitioner TRAF INTERCONTINENTAL ELEKTRONIK-HANDELS GmbH ("TRAF"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the time for SonoCine to file its response to TRAF's Amended Petition [Doc 25] from the current deadline of August 1, 2018, to and ..
More
ORDER REGARDING
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER'S AMENDED PETITION (FIRST REQUEST)
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Defendant/Respondent SONOCINE, INC. ("SonoCine") and Plaintiff/Petitioner TRAF INTERCONTINENTAL ELEKTRONIK-HANDELS GmbH ("TRAF"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend the time for SonoCine to file its response to TRAF's Amended Petition [Doc 25] from the current deadline of August 1, 2018, to and including August 8, 2018.
This is the first request for an extension and is necessitated by SonoCine's counsel's staffing shortages due to current fires in Palomino Valley, Reno, Nevada. This request is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
