Excedis Corporation v. Bollman, 3:16-cv-00514-HDM-WGC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180807g44
Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . On July 9, 2018, Magistrate Judge Cobb issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 116) recommending that plaintiff Excedis Corporation's (Excedis) complaint be dismissed without prejudice and that Excedis' answer to defendants Edward Bollman's and James Kerr's counterclaim be stricken. The time to object to the Report and Recommendation has expired and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(b), the court accepts the Report a
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . On July 9, 2018, Magistrate Judge Cobb issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 116) recommending that plaintiff Excedis Corporation's (Excedis) complaint be dismissed without prejudice and that Excedis' answer to defendants Edward Bollman's and James Kerr's counterclaim be stricken. The time to object to the Report and Recommendation has expired and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(b), the court accepts the Report an..
More
ORDER
HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge.
On July 9, 2018, Magistrate Judge Cobb issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 116) recommending that plaintiff Excedis Corporation's (Excedis) complaint be dismissed without prejudice and that Excedis' answer to defendants Edward Bollman's and James Kerr's counterclaim be stricken. The time to object to the Report and Recommendation has expired and no objections have been filed. Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(b), the court accepts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 116) in whole. Thus, Excedis' complaint (ECF No. 1, Ex. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice and Excedis' answer to the Bollman-Kerr counterclaim (ECF No. 7) is STRICKEN.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
