Gonzalez v. Allied Collection Services, Inc., 2:16-cv-02909. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180809601
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ALLIED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs, Karla Gonzalez and Jaime Retiguin Barba, Sr., and Defendant, Allied Collection Services, Inc., by and through their undersigned counsel of record as follows: (1) This is the second request for an extension of time to oppose Plaintiff'
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ALLIED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs, Karla Gonzalez and Jaime Retiguin Barba, Sr., and Defendant, Allied Collection Services, Inc., by and through their undersigned counsel of record as follows: (1) This is the second request for an extension of time to oppose Plaintiff's..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT ALLIED COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Second Request)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs, Karla Gonzalez and Jaime Retiguin Barba, Sr., and Defendant, Allied Collection Services, Inc., by and through their undersigned counsel of record as follows:
(1) This is the second request for an extension of time to oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment in this matter.
(2) Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. 58], is currently due Friday, July 20, 2018.
(3) Plaintiff's counsel has agreed to give Defendant's an extension through Tuesday, July 24, 2018 to file their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment.
(4) The parties had originally submitted a stipulation of time in this matter on Thursday, July 19, 2018. The stipulation was rejected by this Honorable Court for failure to comply with the Local Rule IA 6-1. Defendant made note of the Local Rule and the parties submit this stipulation as compliant to that Rule.
(5) The parties have subsequently agreed, based on an unexpected illness of Defendant's counsel, to extend the time to respond through Tuesday, July 24, 2018 as reflected above in paragraph 3.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
