Hill v. Baker, 3:14-cv-00680-RCJ-WGC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180809611
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Pro se 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petitioner Rickie L. Hill has filed another motion for extension of time to oppose respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 49). This is at least his third motion for an extension of time. The court shall grant the motion in part and give petitioner a short extension of time. Petitioner is expressly advised that, absent extraordinary circumstances, the court is highly unlikely to grant any further extension. IT
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Pro se 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petitioner Rickie L. Hill has filed another motion for extension of time to oppose respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 49). This is at least his third motion for an extension of time. The court shall grant the motion in part and give petitioner a short extension of time. Petitioner is expressly advised that, absent extraordinary circumstances, the court is highly unlikely to grant any further extension. IT I..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petitioner Rickie L. Hill has filed another motion for extension of time to oppose respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 49). This is at least his third motion for an extension of time. The court shall grant the motion in part and give petitioner a short extension of time. Petitioner is expressly advised that, absent extraordinary circumstances, the court is highly unlikely to grant any further extension.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion for extension of time to oppose the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 49) is GRANTED in part. Petitioner shall file his opposition on or before August 3, 2018.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's second motion to withdraw his motion for date discovery starts (ECF No. 48) is DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
